IN the land of Olympic gold medallists Eric Liddell and Allan Wells, of Commonwealth champions Ian
and Lachie Stewart, of Chris Black, Nat Muir, Cameron Sharp and
Tom McKean, it has been a strange
old decade in men’s athletics.
Just once in that period, all of eight years ago, has the Scottish athlete of the year award been handed to a male runner as women have dominated
the scene.
As that solo representative Allan Scott – the former sprint hurdler who is now an apprentice coach – reckons, it is not something that should generate the slightest concern or even surprise preferring, as is the modern coaching way, to accentuate the positive in noting that: “During my time as an athlete our best and most consistent athlete was Lee McConnell.
Eilidh Doyle followed on from there and then in the last few years Lynsey Sharp and Laura Muir have had fantastic success too.
“I don’t think there is any one explanation why women from Scotland have had comparatively more success than the men over the last few years.”
“To get to the top in a sport like athletics is very difficult whether you’re male or female and from a small nation like Scotland we are never going to have a plethora of talent at the top at one time. The fact that women have dominated the last few years is down to some exceptional individuals and not anything wider than that.”
While the presence of three men on this season’s shortlist is not in itself overly significant by those standards, then, he is, to the point of commendable self-deprecation, hugely encouraged by the fact that it has had to be extended to accommodate the range and quality of contenders.
“I think the most interesting thing for me is how much the depth and the quality of athletes has grown over the last few years,” said Scott.
“When I competed at the Beijing Olympics in 2008 we had four Scots make the team, two women and two men. Then five in London in 2012, all female. Now in Rio, to have 15 make the team is just unprecedented and with that increase in number has come a more even balance in representation, seven men and eight women.
“It was a remarkable achievement and it wasn’t just making the team, we had real medal opportunities. There were six that made their respective finals and of course Eilidh [Doyle] picking up a fantastic bronze as part of the 4x400m team. When I look at the strength and depth on both the men’s and women’s side I’d have been struggling to make the shortlist with my 2008 performances.”
Far more important than gender, then, he sees surrounding athletes with people who have the right mindset and knowhow as key to building on this year’s successes.
“I don’t think the environment required is any different based on gender. The environment required might be slightly different for each individual but I feel some fundamentals must be there; you’ve
got to have a knowledgeable coach,
like-minded training partners and
a support team around you that you trust completely,” he explained.
“I was fortunate when I came through I had Chris Baillie who was European junior champion and a few years older than me to help push me on in the early days under Bob Sommerville. Then later I had Paul Hession and Nick Smith, both Olympic sprinters, who worked under my coach Stuart Hogg. Yet there were others, in both those groups, that didn’t have as much success on the track but were still vital in creating that right environment.
“I think if you want to be successful in this sport then you will search those environments out and I’m sure that regardless of gender the one thing our current top athletes will have done is find the right environment for their talent to flourish.”
He also believes that being able to rub shoulders in training and competition with so many Olympic and Paralympic athletes can only be beneficial for future generations.
“I think that’s vitally important,” said Scott. “For the youngsters to see people getting to a level that they aspire to, who have walked the same path that they’re currently on through age-group athletics in Scotland, can only motivate them and show them what is possible through hard work and dedication.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here