Ian Cathro defended Sam Nicholson last night after Hearts’ second half substitute was dismissed during their 1-0 defeat at the hands of St Johnstone having been accused of spitting at an official.
The midfielder had been on the pitch for only 16 minutes when he was dismissed in the 83rd after assistant referee Stephen Mitchell called referee Nick Walsh over to report the incident, resulting in the red card being shown by the official who was also at the centre of events during last week's Easter Road bust up involving Jim Duffy and Neil Lennon.
“The accusation that has been made is that he has spat in the direction of the assistant referee,” said the Hearts manager.
“We will look at the footage but my understanding from Sam and the players around the situation is there is no way of being able to read that as an aggressive thing.
“Sam says he just spat, not at the assistant referee. Players do that in a game of football, we’ve all seen that before.
“My understanding is that is the case from Sam’s telling of the situation and other players around it. So we suffer twice in games with this referee.”
That was a reference to Mr Walsh’s dismissal of Esmael Goncalves when he was shown two yellow cards against Partick Thistle back in February.
“It was the same situation at Partick Thistle, I think there were some parts in that game where he was a little bit quick to judge but let’s leave that there,” he continued.
“It’s a serious allegation and my understanding again is that the assistant referee has made the decision. So that, to me, puts a lot of pressure on the assistant to be absolutely certain that is the case.
“We will be looking to appeal if we review this and decide Sam is innocent, but let’s do things one step at a time and deal with it properly and as calmly as possible.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel