THERE are an awful lot of ifs, but and maybes standing in the way of Patrick Roberts signing for Celtic but one word which cannot be used is impossible.
This could happen. Compromises would have to be reached, the player himself has to want it and much depends on whether another English Premier League side come in for a 20-year-old whose exquisite performances in Scotland have not gone unnoticed down south.
For all the winger is a talent, Roberts is not going to make it at Manchester City. This is a football club which can with one or two notable exceptions sign anyone in the world. Being surplus to requirements at the Etihad Stadium is no disgrace.
Interestingly, Brendan Rodgers initially wasn’t completely won over by the little Englishman. The Celtic manager’s attackers must know how to defend, to close down, to harry the opposition to within an inch of their lives.
This did not come natural to a man who when he signed on loan 18 months ago at Parkhead made the bold statement that he wanted to be as good as Lionel Messi. However, Rodgers got the message home – doesn’t he always – and in the final four months of the season it was a joy to watch Roberts jinking and dribbling past opponents.
And so the situation now is this: Celtic are ready to offer £5million. City want a few extra million. Celtic therefore must decide whether to break their own rules and pay more than they have for years in a fee and probably wages.
They should do it. Just this once. It would go against the principals of Peter Lawwell but, come one, when have principals and football gone together. If Celtic are ever going to dig that bit deeper than they would be entirely comfortable with then now is the time.
City have so far spent £8m on Roberts, the other £4m which has been quoted in terms of his fee were add-ons which have yet to kick in. Fulham, it is believed, would receive a cut for the player they brought though.
Now a couple of million to Sheik Mansour, whose family owns rather a lot of oil in the UAE, is nothing but that doesn’t mean that City are going to all of a sudden turn away from their capitalist ways and allow their player to leave on the cheap.
However, what I would argue is that £7m - even a few pennies more - for Roberts is cheap. Celtic can afford it. He is a player with definite sell-on potential. Oh, and is one who could make a huge difference when it comes to the Champions League play-offs .
Also, Virgil van Dijk’s imminent move to Liverpool is going to bolster the Parkhead coffers by the best part of what Roberts would cost.
Rodgers stated he would have no qualms about breaking Celtic’s transfer record, which stands at £6m, and while the club understandably have stuck by their financial plan, there has always been scope to tweak said structure.
Let’s say Celtic were prepared to pay £10m – they aren’t but bear with me – and ask yourself what does that get a club these days. I’ll tell you. A bang-average player quite a bit of the time who wouldn’t particularly add anything to the current squad.
Roberts is far from average. He loves Celtic He could stay two more years of winning trophies, playing every week and showcasing himself on big European nights and then get a move back south, which is most likely what he would want, for an increased fee. Everyone would be a winner.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel