THE case for retaining Hampden as the home of Scottish football has been dealt a blow after a survey found just 15 per cent of fans were happy to stay put.
The Scottish Football Association (SFA) is weighing up whether to quit the National Stadium when its lease expires in 2020.
It will cost "many, many millions of pounds" to maintain the historic venue on Glasgow's south side over the span of a new 20-year lease according to SFA chief executive Stewart Regan.
Read more: Hampden Park: An open letter by former Celtic owner Fergus McCann
Now a poll of fans has suggested many believe that cash could be better spent elsewhere.
The Scottish Football Supporters Association (SFSA) carried out a survey of just under 3,000 of its members and found only a sixth wanted to see major internationals and cup finals staged at Hampden.
SFA bosses have already held talks with their rugby counterparts about staging showpiece fixtures at Murrayfield and that prospect was backed by 34 per cent of the poll's respondents.
Meanwhile, another 25 per cent called for major matches to be taken on the road around the country.
Just over half of the supporters rate the overall experience of Hampden - which is owned by Ladbrokes League Two minnows Queen's Park - as "bad or very bad".
Now SFSA chairman Simon Barrow has called on Regan to consult fans before making a final decision on Hampden's fate.
Read more: Hampden Park: An open letter by former Celtic owner Fergus McCann
He said: "The results of the research is concerning. Clearly the status quo is not working, and with such widespread views on the question of the national stadium we believe that a full independent consultation should be conducted before any future decisions are made about Hampden Park.
"It is too big an issue for the SFA to consider alone.
"It is also clear that fans themselves must be involved as key stakeholders in this decision.
"Given the issues that have been highlighted by the research we would also be in favour of further work being done to explore the options to update and improve the current stadium."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here