ENGLAND seamer James Anderson admitted reaching the milestone of 400 Test wickets was a "surreal" feeling.
Anderson joined an elite club containing just 11 other bowlers on the opening day of the second Investec Test against New Zealand when he snared Martin Guptill with his eighth ball of the day.
A fuller length delivery was easily pouched at chest height by Ian Bell standing at second slip to give England a wonderful start to the afternoon following a morning washout.
"It's a nice feeling, a proud moment for me, I guess," said Anderson.
"I don't know what else to say, it feels a bit surreal when you see the list up on the TV with all the guys who've got 400 in the past."
Anderson then claimed the wicket of dangerman Kane Williamson in the same over to vindicate Alastair Cook's decision to field first under cloudy skies at Headingley.
Despite losing two early wickets, the Black Caps continued to take the attack to England's bowlers, best characterised by Kiwi skipper Brendon McCullum launching the first ball he faced over cover for six.
But having slumped to 144 for five, opener Tom Latham and Test debutant Luke Ronchi's partnership of 120 put the Black Caps back on an equal footing.
Latham contributed 84 and Ronchi a blistering 88 from 70 balls as the tourists closed on 297 for eight at a run rate in excess of four and a half an over.
New Zealand's aggression came as no surprise to Anderson and England, who claimed a 1-0 lead in the series earlier this week with a thrilling victory at Lord's.
"The game's moving forward, it's not a shock that they scored as they did," said Anderson.
"When we didn't bowl well they punished us. We've seen a bit of movement off the pitch, a tiny bit with the new ball, but if you get in on it you can score quite freely."
Anderson believes England's own approach has become more positive in recent months following the injection of youth into the side.
It is a step in the right direction according to the 32-year-old ahead of a mouthwatering showdown with Australia later in the summer.
"The players that we've got in the team, Mark Wood and Ben Stokes, they're naturally attacking cricketers and they want to take wickets," added Anderson.
"We've seen Test cricket move forward with New Zealand scoring at such a rate, Australia are going to be aggressive when they come over here and we're looking to play that same sort of cricket and fight fire with fire when it comes to that.
"It's been a good period for me and Stuart Broad. We've always relied on bowling economically but seeing these guys come in is quite a fresh feel to the side which is good, I think."
From 264 for five, New Zealand will perhaps rue the loss of three wickets late in the day, with Latham and Ronchi departing in successive overs from Stuart Broad, who was the pick of England's bowlers, if a shade expensive, with three for 83.
Ronchi though, said: "It was a good day. To make 300 on day one in 65 overs is a pretty good effort, especially after being two for two.
"We were pushing the game along at a good run-rate. People were just doing their natural thing."
Ronchi in particular played a special innings, with flashy shots either side of the wicket, but he fell 12 runs short of what would have been a Test century on debut.
The 34-year-old, making his belated bow in the longest format after replacing the injured Corey Anderson, was unsettled by several short-pitched deliveries by Broad and eventually succumbed to the seamer after picking out Anderson at fine-leg.
But he said: "I've had a decent first day.
"I've dreamed of playing Test cricket for as long as I've known the game. It's late in my career but it's still pretty cool."
"I wanted to make sure I didn't go out there and not play naturally; it'd be an injustice in my mind.
"I wouldn't play the innings any differently. I can't complain; I got 88 and am more than happy with that."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article