Tino Best and Denesh Ramdin's last-wicket heroics stunned England at Edgbaston, but were still powerless to permanently revive the rain-ravaged third Investec Test.
After a 143-run partnership between record-breaking No.11 Best (95) and Ramdin (107no) was cancelled out by Kevin Pietersen and Ian Bell's century stand, a draw looms.
Once England's reply to West Indies' 426 was given substance by Pietersen (78) and Bell (76no) in a stumps total of 221 for five, this contest was headed down a blind alley. There were nonetheless points of interest, topped by Best's highest score in Test history for any No.11.
Pietersen will also have derived satisfaction at signing off in style for the next month – thanks to his retirement from limited-overs cricket –although not as much as if he had gone on to a near run-a-ball 21st Test century, which appeared his before he edged Marlon Samuels to slip.
His and Bell's innings were accomplished, and significant, after England stumbled to 49 for three, but bordered on the mundane in comparison with what preceded them.
In a mesmerising and hugely entertaining morning session, Andrew Strauss' world No.1s simply had no answer to Best and Ramdin.
The fast bowler, back in Test cricket after a three-year absence, hammered England morale with an exhibition of clean striking – and measured defence when necessary.
His carefree approach and unheralded skill entirely belied his batting position, and brought him 14 fours and a six from 112 balls. Best dominated the first 50 runs of his stand with Ramdin, whose share was just eight runs.
By the time the pair had 100 between them, Ramdin had redressed the balance a little – on his way to a 160-ball hundred which contained nine boundaries and was followed by an equally notable gesture in celebration.
The wicketkeeper had clearly taken to heart criticism from West Indies great Viv Richards and, on reaching his century, dug into his pocket to unfurl a hand-written message which read "Yeah Viv Talk Nah".
Best marked his partner's achievement by immediately smashing Tim Bresnan high over long-on for six.
The No.11 had announced himself with a series of resounding drives against Steven Finn and Graham Onions. But his defence and effective avoidance of the short ball were sound too, and two forces for four off Graeme Swann also required impressive footwork.
England's prospects of an unlikely victory had nosedived from slim to nonexistent. Instead, the Windies could fleetingly just about hope for a consolation success in a series already lost – until Bell and Pietersen intervened with their partnership of 137.
Ravi Rampaul had Alastair Cook lbw pushing forward; Jonathan Trott edged Darren Sammy down on to off-stump, and Best had Strauss cutting the second ball of his second spell high to slip where Darren Bravo held a very good catch.
Bell was reprieved just before tea when Adrian Barath put him down on 20 at short-leg off Sunil Narine. But thereafter he raced past Pietersen to his 50 – including five fours from 10 Rampaul deliveries at one stage.
When Finn began the day by making short work of Rampaul, caught behind in the first, it seemed England would quickly wrap up the Windies innings.
But Best had other ideas – and England came close to success only once, but Pietersen failed to hold a devilishly difficult chance at gully after Ramdin climbed into a short ball from Finn on 69 with the total on 326.
Best rubbed from the record books Zaheer Khan's 75, as the top score from a No.11, when he cut Bresnan high over gully for four. It seemed things could hardly get any worse for shell-shocked England.
But there was an extra indignity when they appeared to forget the rules and tried to make their way off for lunch only to be called back by umpires who had remembered that with nine down an extra half-hour must be played, or until a wicket finally fell.
It did at last, when within one shot of a maiden first-class hundred, Best tried to complete the job in a single blow but edged a smear at Onions (four for 88) high for Strauss to take the catch running back from slip.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article