THE Raith Rovers chairman Alan Young admits John Hughes lost the dressing room at Stark’s Park as the Fifers crashed to relegation.
Young concedes that the players “got more than they bargained for” after counting on Hughes’ no-nonsense style to arrest the slump between October and February during which they failed to win a match under Gary Locke.
However, Hughes proved wildly unpopular, with his repeated rants and unwillingness to shoulder enough of the blame alienating players.
That was underlined during an astonishing tirade at his players following the 5-0 defeat at St Mirren, after which he questioned their quality, character and attitudes.
Young believes those admonishments should have been done privately and acknowledges that it did nothing to motivate a squad already lacking in confidence.
Hughes’ disastrous reign ended in ignominy as Rovers were relegated at the hands of Brechin City on Saturday.
“We deliberately looked to appoint John Hughes because of his more macho approach – possibly Gary Locke was too nice a guy,” said Young candidly. “But maybe we got more than we bargained for with him.
“He came in at a bad time for this club and tried to get us out of that. However there are things that – if they need to be done or said – that should happen within the dressing room. Some things have been done publicly that, in my opinion, should not have been done publicly.”
Asked if Hughes’ style had a negative effect on the players, he simply added: “Yes”.
While Rovers’ malaise undoubtedly started under Locke, Young is adamant the appointment of the former Hearts and Kilmarnock manager was not a mistake.
Locke was dismissed in February following a winless run of 14 matches with the Fifers precariously close to the relegation zone, but the Stark’s Park chairman believes the downfall of his tenure came in the form of his recruitment.
The failure of high-profile flops such as Rudi Skacel and Ryan Stevenson was exacerbated by underwhelming arrivals such as Joel Coustrain, Scott Roberts, Ryan Hardie, Jordan Thompson and Robbie Crawford.
“We were aware of Gary’s win percentages at previous clubs,” explained Young. “But there were specific reasons at both Hearts and Kilmarnock. We felt that, while there was a risk, it was a risk worth taking. With the benefit of hindsight, that didn’t work.
“However, and I’ll probably get pelters for this, I don’t believe the appointment of Gary Locke was a mistake. Where it went wrong was that we did not control his recruitment policy. We had a good nucleus of players here, and the players he brought in did not blend well with the existing group.”
Young, meanwhile, has expressed regret regarding the Lewis Vaughan farce.
He was loaned to Championship rivals Dumbarton in January when the teams were a mere five points apart. Vaughan proceeded to score four goals as his loan club overhauled his parent on on goal difference. The midfielder's goals earned Dumbarton six points.
“The manager indicated that he was not going to get game time here,” said Young. “The only interest came from Dumbarton. It was then a matter of sitting down and saying ‘do we do this?’ At the time we were not intending on being relegated or being drawn into a relegation dog-fight. Of course it is a regret, with the benefit of hindsight, so let’s just ensure that he is the player who gets us promoted next season.”
Rovers will seek to make a swift appointment as they rebuild ahead of next season, with interviews expected to begin this week.
In the fullness of time, however, Young has confirmed he will consider his own position.
“We are all supporters. It has been a horrendously stressful time,” added Young. “At the right time, I will certainly be giving consideration to my position – but the right time is not now. We have just been relegated, we don’t have a manager and we need to move ahead, and move ahead quickly.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here