THERE can be fewer thankless tasks in football than occupying a lone striker role when your team has been reduced to 10 men – unless you are St Mirren’s Gavin Reilly.
In need of a hero following Gary Irvine’s 33rd minute dismissal, the front-man delighted a noisy away contingent with two second-half strikes to give Saints an unlikely victory at the Tony Macaroni Arena, ending Livingston’s 17 game unbeaten run.
There has rarely been a dull moment with the Paisley men this campaign and the addition of demoted whistler Craig Thomson into the mix did nothing to dilute the drama.
Saints manager Jack Ross clashed with the referee in the second period and found himself taking in the last 20 minutes from the stands, but still, he couldn’t hide his delight at full time.
“We showed massive character in the second half,” he said. “It was a really important win for us, psychologically. To win a game of football with 10 men is very difficult at any level, never mind having to do it for so long. I think we deserved to win just for the amount of courage we showed.”
Livingston’s Craig Halkett scored at both ends to first put his side behind and then drag them level with a bullet header, shortly before Irvine saw red for a lunge on Dale Carrick.
The effervescent Reilly then tore up the second-half script as he fired the 10 men to a crucial away win with two typical striker’s finishes.
Livingston boss David Hopkin cut a frustrated figure as his side huffed and puffed but never looked like recovering the game.
He said: “The goals we conceded were embarrassing, it was school-boy stuff. In the first half we should have been a few goals up, but that’s the Championship – if you don’t take your chances you’ll get punished.
“Fair play to St Mirren, they’ve defended well and put their chances away.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel