ALLY McCOIST has admitted he is entirely in the dark about whether he will be asked to sell or release players next month.
The Rangers manager has also still to learn if he has any chance of signing anyone after new club chief executive Graham Wallace hinted at major Ibrox cost-cutting.
McCoist will meet Wallace early in the new year after the club's chief executive said the cost base was far too high at Rangers and had to be reduced. Wallace went as far as claiming the club was spending at a rate which would be unsustainable even if Rangers were in the SPFL Premiership, let alone League 1.
Wallace has made a positive early impression on McCoist, although a degree of tension between them will be inevitable if one wants to make cuts and the other intends to maintain, or even add, to his existing squad. Wallace has begun a 120-day review of how Rangers is run, but before and after last week's annual meeting he insisted that too much money was being spent and cuts were unavoidable.
"I had a couple of meetings with Graham before the agm and a couple since," said McCoist. "Being honest, in terms of the footballing side of the business we will definitely sit down in the new year to see what we think is best for moving the club forward.
"Graham's made a statement that he will reassess and evaluate the entire business. As yet, we haven't had any discussions about players in, players out, or movement in January. Those discussions will take place on his return. I have no idea if we will have to lose players. I haven't been told. Like most managers, I'm a little bit unsure about what is going to happen in January.
"I don't know if the prospect of new signings is on hold. That's not a cop-out, I just don't know. I'll be far better placed to comment once Graham has made a full assessment of the entire business. It's obvious that Graham and I can't sit down and make football decisions until he has a full overview of what is going on. I've said before that we could do with another player in the striking department, but I'm not sure if that will be the case or not."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article