FOR all the opprobrium cast upon Luis Suarez for biting an opponent earlier in these World Cup finals, it has not stopped others from having a little nibble.
FIFA confirmed last night that the Uruguayan Football Association have appealed the ban imposed on the striker for biting Italy defender Giorgio Chiellini.
The Uruguayan FA had until this Sunday to respond to the sanctions - which comprises a fourth-ban from all football activity - but were always expected to appeal, even though Suarez has since admitted his actions and apologised. The decision will rest with FIFA's appeal committee if the suspension is upheld, decreased or increased. Regardless of their decision, the striker from undergoing a medical this summer, with talks having started regarding a move to Barcelona.
Chiellini has stated publicly that the ban imposed on Suarez is too severe, although his sympathy has not been universal. Pele, the Brazilian great, last night admonished Suarez further and insisted that FIFA should uphold their fourth-month ban to avoid similar incidents in the future,
"If he was not sanctioned in this way, then such incidents could be repeated," said Pele. "No player can do what Luis Suarez did. I believe that the punishment is fair. FIFA's decision is good and is correct because it sets an example."
The Brazilian - who won the World Cup on three occasions during his career - is confident that Suarez will recover from his latest ignominy. "He's a great player and he will bounce back," he added.
Pele was more effusive in his praise of compatriot Neymar. The forward will join his national side tonight in a quarter-final match with Colombia, with the hopes of the home nation on his shoulders. "I have been very happy for Neymar," Pele said. "He showed a lot of confidence and experience for his first ever World Cup."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article