DOES the punishment fit the crime?
When the Scottish Premier League clubs meet on July 4 to answer one of Scottish football's biggest questions, it could be more than the future of Rangers on the line.
The news that Charles Green had yesterday submitted an application for his newco Rangers to be granted permission to play in the top flight next season came as no surprise yet confusion and conjecture surrounded the decision.
As things stand, Rangers have four potential opponents for their first match of the new campaign, depending on whether they are given an SPL place, parachuted into the Scottish Football League's first division, with Dundee or Dunfermline taking an SPL berth, or handed the ultimate sanction and demoted to the third division.
Nothing can be said for certain regarding Rangers' future, but the Morton chairman Douglas Rae says the need to see justice being done must be at the top of the agenda.
"I don't think there is any chance of Rangers being relegated to the third division," Rae told Herald Sport. "I think they will either remain within the SPL or be relegated to the first division, possibly the latter on balance. They could be relegated to the first division to show that they have received a punishment.
"Rangers have got to be punished, without a doubt. If that had been Kilmarnock, or someone of that ilk, there would be no debate about what would happen. Rangers have already had a lot of special consideration which, if it had been a lesser team, would not have happened.
"Rangers have to be punished. They share that view but their problem is that they feel the punishments that the SFA and SPL want to lay down are excessive. Fair is not just balance on the Rangers side, it has to be fair for football. They have to treat it the same as any other team.
"Charles Green said that the SFA should sit down with them and discuss their punishment and negotiate it. I think that is rubbish. You don't walk up to court and say to the judge 'I think you and I should discuss what would be a fair punishment for what I have done'. They have got to be punished. Justice must be seen to be done."
The financial benefits of placing newco Rangers in the lower leagues would be considerable for the 29 other member clubs and Rae admits he would have no qualms about seeing the Glasgow giants slotted into Scotland's second tier for next season.
"From a personal point of view, I would not be unhappy about it. I know it would diminish our chances of winning promotion to the SPL for one year but you would get the benefit of Rangers for one year. We just need to wait and see what transpires because nothing is sure or for certain at this moment.
Rangers' route into the first division may seem an acceptable compromise for many but significant hurdles will need to be overcome first.
Speculation regarding a revamp of the league structure, culminating in SPL1 and SPL2 could prove the way ahead, allowing for Rangers to be punished while keeping them within the SPL structure.
The SFA is reportedly keen to rubber stamp the radical overhaul before the start of the new campaign but Rae has reservations about quickfire change.
He said: "An SPL2 would allow Rangers to just be slipped into that league. The formation of SPL2 could not be decided retrospectively, however. You have to play for it, you can't just do it. It can't come down to teams who have the biggest attendances."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article