RICHARD FOSTER, the Rangers defender, believes Motherwell have an easier task of winning through the Play-Offs.
The full-back believes the fact his team must play six games, as opposed to two, hands the Fir Park men a big advantage.
Foster, of course, could be playing mind-games ahead of Thursday's first leg at Ibrox, but he did point out that the Rangers players have a lot more miles on the clock compared to Motherwell.
Speaking to Rangers TV, he said: "I think that the way that the Play-Offs are structured is not favourable to the teams that are in our division.
"So to get up that way would be a success and would cap off what has been an okay season. It's always going to be difficult having to play six games but we've come through these four already and we've shown that we've got good quality.
"It's a massive credit to the players inside the dressing room that we're now at this point. When you look at some of the boys who have played in all of the games like Nicky Law, who has played something like 51 or 52 games, then it has been very tough and a long season for those players."
Foster admitted that his focus over the past few years has solely been to be part of getting Rangers back to Scottish football's top tier.
And that beating Motherwell over the next two games would be a personal highlight after some ups and downs in blue and white.
"When I joined the club a couple of years ago, what I wanted to do was help the club get back to where they should be playing, " said Foster.
"Obviously we wanted that to be done already but it's not been the case, so this is our chance to salvage something from the season and personally that would be as great an achievement as it would be for the club."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article