THEY may have been separated by just one place at the start of the day, but there was a massive gulf between Stirling Albion and East Stirlingshire as both attempted to maintain their 100% start to the term on Saturday.
Greig McDonald recognised as much, making the concession as freely as his Stirling defenders had in this 3-1 home defeat. "We got what we deserved," he admitted. "We gave East Stirling three goals. We didn't start playing until we went 3-0 down and it's easy to play at that point. We're better than that."
It was a fair assessment. Not only was the hosts' defending slack, but a lack of width and movement up front left them lacking attacking potency, in stark contrast to their organised and more clinical opponents. Stirling had more possession but struggled to build any momentum, whereas John Coughlin's side used their time on the ball to great effect. Indeed, they scored with their first chance, Max Wright's corner finding defender Michael Bolochoweckyj in acres of space at the front post to head in.
Wright was the dangerman for the away side. By far the best player on the park, he was involved in all three East Stirling goals and hit a post twice himself. The attacker who took advantage of a terrible Ross Forsyth header before cutting back to Paul Quinn, who finished from close range to put the visitors 2-0 ahead after 24 minutes. East Stirling's third came nine minutes into the second-half, with Wright involved again as his effort struck up upright and Jordan McKechnie smashed in the rebound. "It'll come if I keep working away," said Wright of his failure to score. "As long as we win, but I want a goal."
With a three-goal lead, the visitors were able to sit back, but Stirling looked more dangerous later on and pulled one back with 12 minutes left. David Weatherston took a Mark Ferry pass in his stride and squared it to Jordan White, who tucked it in.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article