Louis van Gaal launched a three-pronged attack on Gary Neville, his own players and long-term foe Ronald Koeman after Manchester United's 2-1 win at Southampton.
The Old Trafford boss questioned former United defender Neville's credentials in claiming the Red Devils "got away with murder" with a scrappy victory at St Mary's.
Robin van Persie's double edged United home, with Van Gaal only satisfied with three of his stars' performances.
Neville condemned United's patchy performance on social media and on Sky Sports, claiming Sunday's Premier League clash with Liverpool could be "like The Dog and Duck versus The Red Lion".
"The former player of United?" asked Van Gaal when quizzed on England coach Neville's comments.
"That's an English expression? Hmm: maybe (United got away with murder).
"He can say everything because he is an ex-legend, but as an ex-legend, or a legend, you have to know what you are saying.
"You can interpret: make an interpretation of that.
"It's not so difficult to make an interpretation, when I say he has to pay attention to his words."
Van Gaal claimed Van Persie's "best performance" in his short managerial stint at United sealed a victory his side barely deserved.
The former Barcelona boss hauled off youngster Paddy McNair in the 39th minute and was forced to rearrange his side with Saints pressing continuously.
Van Gaal said "too many" of his players underperformed, but refused to point any fingers.
"I think that not only the goals are telling something about Robin Van Persie, I think also his performance: he was one of only three players on the pitch of Manchester United who were good, or maybe very good," said Van Gaal.
"He had a great influence on the result. Until now that is his best performance.
"Too many players were not good.
"There was a range of course between good and bad, but they were not good.
"Normally you have six, seven, eight who are good and three in that other range.
"But today there were too many players in that range who were not good, I believe."
Saints levelled through Graziano Pelle, but slipped to their third consecutive defeat, leaving manager Koeman furious "the better team" lost.
Van Gaal offered a thinly-veiled barb at his long-term adversary, taking first blood in the Premier League battle against his former friend.
Van Gaal once mentored Koeman into coaching at Barcelona, but the pair's feud has now lasted 10 years.
"Of course if you are the better team you deserve more, but believe me it is always the goals that are counting," said Van Gaal.
"When we played the first six or seven matches, we never won and we were always the better team.
"In that time I didn't say anything about that. You have to learn that also."
Koeman was left to rue another defeat against high-profile opponents, after the 3-0 home loss to Manchester City and 1-0 reverse at Arsenal.
The former Holland full-back refused to address Van Gaal or United directly, but admitted "everything is s*** because we lost".
"We did everything, we created chances, but we made mistakes as well," said Koeman.
"Maybe they made more mistakes than us, but they have players who handle those kinds of mistakes, and that was the difference.
"Because on football and chances, I think we deserved more.
"It's easy in my opinion, we did not lose against Man United tonight, we lost by ourselves.
"Of course it's always difficult, because you're the better team, and again you have to fight against 1-2 down.
"After that moment I think we didn't play well, but that's the difference.
"At this level, detail makes the difference in football.
"The score is 1-2 and you can talk much longer about who played football, which team pressed, but everything is s*** because we lost."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article