Britain's current heatwave could have contributed to smaller crowds than expected at the Open last week, according to tournament organisers.
The R&A was expecting 160,000 fans at Muirfield and hoping for 170,000, but a total of 'just' 142,036 made the trip to East Lothian during the week, with 29,247 there yesterday to see Phil Mickelson lift the Claret Jug.
A total of 160,595 spectators were at Muirfield the last time the Open was staged there in 2002, with 31,422 watching Ernie Els emerge victorious on the final day following a four-man play-off.
Ticket prices of £75 have been blamed for the drop in attendance, but a spokesman for the Open Championship said: "More than 142,000 people attended the Open. That is almost 90% of the figure in 2002 and we are pleased with this attendance.
"Advance ticket sales were very strong and we believe the extremely warm weather put off some of our pay-at-the-gate customers.
"That is perhaps why, unusually, we had a higher attendance on Sunday in cooler weather than we did on Friday which is normally the busiest day. The blend of a British winner of the Tour de France and Ashes cricket on television over the last few days may also have had an impact."
More than 180,000 fans were at Lytham last year when tickets cost £70, although children under 16 are given free entry when accompanied by an adult and organisers feel the amount of play - particularly on the first two days - ensures value for money.
The attendance figures are below:
(2002) 2013
Practice Days (30,862) 31,320
Thursday (30,620) 23,393
Friday (34,479) 29,144
Saturday (33,212) 28,932
Sunday (31,422) 29,247
Total (160,595) 142,036
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article