The Olympic swimming programme came to an end last night with Michael Phelps bowing out with the 18th gold medal of a career few athletes are ever likely to match.
It also concluded what has been a disappointing meet for the host nation, who finished with two bronze medals for Rebecca Adlington and a silver for Michael Jamieson in the 200 metres breaststroke in a performance that promises a great future.
There was a fourth place on the final evening for the men's 4x100m medley relay, fifth for Fran Halsall in the 50m freestyle and eighth-place finishes for the women's medley relay and Daniel Fogg in the 1500m freestyle.
For Halsall the meet has fallen way short of what she had hoped for.
Seen as a possible medal contender in more than one event, the 22-year-old came away with nothing.
Instead there were two fifth-place finishes, sixth in the 100m freestyle, as well as an eighth.
The Loughborough ITC swimmer missed the podium by eight one hundredths of a second last night after finishing the one length event in 24.47 seconds.
Afterwards the Southport-born swimmer was in tears as she reflected on her campaign.
She said: "All I can say is that the crowd has been amazing. The support I have had this week has been incredible. It is just me who hasn't been incredible.
"Things are sent to try you and it really has tried me. I couldn't have tried any more. I gave it my absolute all. It's just what I wanted.
"I think it's pretty hard to talk about it now because it's still so raw and I haven't processed it all."
Of tonight's final, she sobbed: "I can't really put it in to words. I'm sorry. I'm just emotional. I'm sorry.
"I am going to have a holiday and a drink! I can't say much more. It's so raw. I'm going to go to a foreign island.
"The support has been amazing.
"It just feels like a kick in the b******s."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article