It’s hardly novel to suggest that the life of an athlete is a strange one, but every so often, something happens to highlight just how ultra-professionalised elite sport is nowadays. One of those incidences arose in Andy Murray’s first-round match at the Australian Open earlier this week. The world No.1 was up against Illya Marchenko from Ukraine in the sweltering heat of Melbourne when the television cameras caught Murray having something of a rant during one of the changeovers. The Scot was pointing furiously at his bottle of water and gesturing to his team but, in the moment, no one knew what had prompted this outburst. In his aftermatch press conference though, Murray explained all; he has a specific volume of liquid that he should drink during each match depending on the length of the match and the conditions he is playing in. He was unable to see how many millilitres were in the bottle he was drinking from so this threatened to upset his hydration plan.
Murray never did work out the volume of water that was in his bottle but he won the match despite having havoc wreaked on his carefully constructed plan. It is yet another example of the attention to detail that Murray displays and, without this consideration of every single element that could affect his performance, would he be at the very top? Almost certainly not.
Another insightful moment into the life of the very best in the world came at Rafa Nadal’s pre-tournament press conference. The Spaniard has had a torrid time of it of late with injuries but, coming into 2017, he looked as fit as he has in some considerable time. His promising form led a journalist to ask the nine-time French Open champion if he was pain-free going into the first grand slam of the year. The question was met with utter confusion by Nadal, who seemed to fail to understand what being pain-free actually meant, not because of a language barrier but rather because the idea of ever being pain-free was such an alien concept to the 30 year-old. “I am not injured, no,” said the bemused former world No.1. “But being pain-free is a long time ago.”
To an elite athlete, the idea of being pain-free is utterly ridiculous. Every athlete who is anywhere near the top of their sport must push their body as close to breaking point as possible, which is why that line so often gets crossed. It is these fine points – the attention to detail and the constant soreness – that must be kept in mind by the countless observers who claim that they could have been an elite athlete if they had really wanted to. How many people could tolerate waking up sore every morning, only to push your body to its limit yet again that day? How many people could count every millilitre of liquid and morsel of food that they put in their body? Not many. And it’s these insights into the lives of the very best that serve as a reminder that talent is only a tiny percentage of what it takes to make it to the top in sport.
AND ANOTHER THING….
This evening, a 110-minute documentary called Icarus will premier at the Sundance Festival in Utah. It is about Grigory Rodchenkov, the Russian who was the central figure in his country’s state-sponsored doping regime and who has now become one of the most influential whistleblowers in sport. For the first time, he will speak in his own words of how everything in Russia happened and by all sounds of it, it is likely to be a fascinating watch. In a similar vein, the BBC World Service has made a quite brilliant short film which was released in recent weeks about Yuliya Stepanova, the Russian middle-distance runner who was the first to accuse Russian officials of perpetrating widespread doping of their athletes and it was the 30 year-old who started the ball rolling in uncovering quite how huge the scale of Russia’s cheating was.
While these films are both fascinating and informative, they highlight a serious issue; whistleblowers remain more comfortable speaking to documentary makers then those within sport who are charged with preventing doping. Neither the World Anti-Doping Agency nor the IOC have convinced whistleblowers that their organisations are the best people to speak to when they want to divulge what they know. This is a serious issue as it means that those whose jobs it is to stop doping in sport must have to wait until they watch a documentary or read a newspaper report before they can begin to react. In these circumstances, no action is proactive, it is all reactive and by that point, it is too late. Rodchenkov’s revelations this evening are likely to be equally as fascinating as were Stepanova’s when she first spoke. These individuals are putting their lives at risk by speaking out. Yet something remains seriously wrong when they would rather do it to a television camera than those in charge of sport.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here