IS it just me, or has sport in this country taken an upturn?
It's easy, of course, to interpret evidence to suit one's hopes or beliefs; religions have done this for centuries. However, in the sporting arena, our star may, indeed, be on the ascendant.
There's always a risk that, in one's desire to see sport contribute to making the world a better place (in terms of legacy: health, education, social inclusion etc, all the raft of benefits we routinely hear) and to see Scotland's status improve on the world stage, we may read more into the facts than we should.
The evidence is not always unequivocal and must be weighed. In an increasingly performance-judged society, especially a sporting one where funding depends on results, national agencies and sport governing bodies hire spin doctors to spread the gospel according to their own particular agenda.
Yet even cynical analysts must acknowledge some encouraging statistics. Seven swimmers, headed by the Olympic silver medallist Michael Jamieson, were named this week in a 27-strong GB team for the world championships in Barcelona later this month. There were six Scots in last year's Olympic team, one of whom has now retired and three of whom are absent from the team announced for Barcelona.
Yet qualifying standards for Spain are even higher than they were for London 2012. For example, Jamieson needed to meet a 200 metres breast-stroke standard of 2min. 11.74 sec. for the Olympics. The time he needed for Barcelona, which opens a week on Sunday, is 2:11.67. For Glasgow 2014, it's more modest – 2:14.09 – yet that's still more than a second faster than the world record David Wilkie set to win Olympic gold in 1976. Jamieson is fastest in the world this year at 200m breaststroke, yet only second in Britain at 100m, a measure of how strong domestic competition is.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article