THANK the Lord for John, the column's resident psychiatrist.
"I am hearing voices," I told him. "When?" he replied. "Mostly when I am driving," I replied.
"Your car radio is on," he said.
He was right. My confusion was caused by the lack of a radio in my previous car, my Nissan Dorma. Its sound system gave up around the time of punk and I was condemned to drive around with only my heart murmur as background noise.
Finally, to a sigh from the decomposing mass of rubbish in the back (I was sleeping there in a hiatus between wage cheques), the Nissan died.
I am now the very proud owner of a four-year-old Ford Fiesta which serves as a constant reminder of my achievements. The circumstance of tootling towards retirement in a second-hand car with all the power of a Flymo gives an irrefutable impression that life has not worked out the way one hoped.
But John's intervention has calmed me and my slalom run past the holes on Maryhill Road (just when did that meteorite hit?) is now accompanied by a commentary from Talksport.
I have taken to it the way Ollie Reed embraced all-day opening. My name is Hugh. I am a Talksport addict.
This obsession comes with the sort of self-loathing only normally experienced after finding oneself waking up to Edna the inebriate after an afternoon on the hair lacquer. And that only happened twice.
One knows instantly that one can be listening to rubbish. For example, Eamonn Holmes was on during the week. I would find it difficult to feign interest if Eamonn was telling me how much I had won on a lottery rollover week. His views on Manchester United are thus of as much intrigue as a discussion on the layout of the Baghdad phone book.
Darren Gough, too, can be wearing, though I have come up with a game that can be played while driving in search of enlightenment at a fitba' press conference. It involves counting how many cliches the former cricketer can string together. He can be breathtakingly spectacular: "The Championship is a hard league to get out of. No team is too good to be relegated, though goals change games and the big players always relish the big matches and when I were a player I always wanted to bounce back from a defeat. Manchester United will be hurting and a hurting Manchester United is a dangerous Manchester United and a dangerous Manchester United is a hurting Manchester United."
This splendid sequence was only spilled by Darren insisting: "By the way, I think Schopenhauer was bang out of order with his criticism of the proofs of the parallel postulate." It was hard to disagree but it broke the magic spell of cliche.
This appears, almost inevitably, throughout the day on Talksport but there is a comfort in that and also the regular rays of sunshine. Stan Collymore and Ray Houghton are good, insightful analysts who create discussion and there are some shows that chunter along quite nicely. Hawksbee and Jacobs can even be informative and it is impossible not to have a snigger with Alan Brazil, who also seems to be broadcasting from the snug bar of a pub next to a bookies.
The unctuous Richard Keys and the overly boisterous Andy Gray, both of whom washed up on Talksport after the wreckage of their time at Sky Sports, can be an acquired taste but regularly they provide interesting broadcasting and every now and again there is a veritable gem. They had Henning Berg on the other day and he was gently informative on working with Kenny Dalglish and Alex Ferguson and even presented a decent case as to why Robbie Keane was the most difficult player he faced. To a football obsessive, this is crack cocaine.
The real bag of high-grade mind-altering substance is not Darren's ramblings, however, but the uplifting narcotic of the marvellous interview.
I once listened to a Graeme Souness interview where the great midfielder talked about how he played the game as a young player and how he adapted in later life. It was brutally honest and it gave a wonderful insight on the game.
He also did not talk about Scottish football. And maybe that's why I like Talksport so much.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article