DAVID MILLAR has criticised a decision by one of professional cycling's biggest sponsors to pull out of the sport due to the crisis sparked by the Lance Armstrong doping revelations.
The Dutch bank Rabobank, principal sponsor of one of the top teams, will end their 17-year involvement on December 31. The move came after the team suspended their Spanish rider Carlos Barredo after the International Cycling Union (UCI) launched a doping case against him.
A former team member, Levi Leipheimer, one of 11 former team-mates of Armstrong who testified against him to the US anti-doping agency (USADA), said he took EPO while with Rabobank assisted by their team doctor. He also testified that other members of the Rabobank team used banned substances.
Scot Millar said on Twitter: "Dear Rabobank, you were part of the problem. How dare you walk away from your young clean guys who are part of the solution. Sickening."
Rabobank confirmed on their website that their sponsorship deals in amateur cycling will continue but they will sever ties with their men's and women's professional teams.
Bert Bruggink, a member of Rabobank's managing board, said: "It is with pain in our heart, but for the bank this is an inevitable decision.
"We are no longer convinced the international professional world of cycling can make this a clean and fair sport. We are not confident this will change for the better in the foreseeable future."
The UCI said in a statement: "In light of the difficult period, namely the high public interest in past doping issues and perhaps a more recent action taken by the UCI against a rider of the team, the UCI understand the context which has led to this decision being reached.' The UCI also said its president, Pat McQuaid, would reveal the body's response to the USADA report in Geneva on Monday.
Meanwhile, John Fahey, the president of the World Anti-Doping Agency, said they will consider holding a doping amnesty across all sports once the USADA investigation is complete.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article