A promising hammer thrower in her teens, Myra Perkins once thought that a place among the elite was just a large ball and chain's throw away.
Lured south to Loughborough University, the Falkirk-born athlete had no reason to expect her nascent career to drift off course so badly.
Until Sunday, on the campus where the 22-year-old spends her evenings answering phone calls, the bell seemed to have sounded on her career. Until she delivered a mark of 63.11 metres - beyond the Scottish qualification mark for the Commonwealth Games - Perkins wondered if her time would ever come.
"There have been parts which were frustrating," she says of three years of stagnation. "A lot of tears which my poor coach has had to deal with, tantrums as well. But I made certain decisions, with exams and taking on the chair of the athletics club, knowing it would affect my throwing but it was the only time I'd have that opportunity."
Another chance now beckons. Perkins has to achieve the standard once more before the June 8 deadline to qualify for the Games and then hope that other have taken notice of her performances. With Susan McKelvie chosen by Scotland in advance, Perkins is competing alongside top-ranked Rachel Hunter and Kimberley Reed for one of the remaining places. Distances will be a key criteria but not the sole means to determining who will be picked.
Perkins has acknowledged that the contest for places could go right to the wire, with the quartet having all committed to competitions during the next three weeks. "I'm glad that everyone's coming out and fighting for it so we can all turn around and say we've done the best we can," she adds. "It's just a shame it will be so close but that's sport."
Guy Learmonth had cause for optimism too after he improved his 800m personal best to 1:46.85 yesterday, coming sixth at the IAAF Challenge meeting in Beijing. However, Olympic high jump bronze medallist Robbie Grabarz confirmed he will miss England's Commonwealth Games quest to undergo knee surgery.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article