IF anybody doubted the virtues of perseverance, they should have watched Nico Rosberg's splendid performance while taking his first checkered flag in Formula One in China yesterday.
Ever since 2006, this brainy fellow, who speaks half-a-dozen languages, was offered a place to study aerodynamics at Imperial College in London, and holds dual nationality in Germany and Finland, has been touted as a future world champion – not least because his father, Keke, was king of the globe in 1982 – and yet he has struggled to transform his potential into tangible achievement.
This was Rosberg's 111th grand prix and other individuals might have started to question their ability, but the 26-year-old dominated the event, sped to his goal, and left his opponents trailing far behind, as if to herald the arrival of another challenger to Sebastian Vettel. Suddenly, and even before the caravan has moved back to Europe, the latter looks vulnerable.
The manner of Rosberg's victory also re-ignited the issue of how much longer Michael Schumacher, his Mercedes team-mate, will linger in the sport, considering the anti-climactic nature in which he exited. At his first pit stop, when his crew forgot to tighten the nut on his right front wheel, it quickly hastened the retirement of the seven-time world title-winner and surely made him ask: "Why am I doing this?"
There is striving for new challenges and then there is screaming into the void and Schumacher has long since passed the point where anybody expects him to gain fresh titles.
When one examines the fashion in which the 2012 campaign is unfolding, there are at least half-a-dozen drivers with the belief that they can grapple for the main prize. This includes the McLaren duo, Lewis Hamilton and Jenson Button, the Red Bulls' Vettel and Mark Webber – despite their early travails – Ferrari's Fernando Alonso, and we can now add Rosberg's name to the roster.
Rosberg demonstrated the extent of the talent which saw him post the fastest lap time at the Bahrain Grand Prix back in 2006. Don't bet against him repeating that exploit when he returns there next weekend.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article