THE Saracens winger Chris Ashton could face a lengthy ban after being charged by the Rugby Football Union with two acts of biting.
The 29-year-old, capped 39 times by England, is alleged to have bitten Northampton prop Alex Waller during Saturday's 27-12 Aviva Premiership victory, and will appear before a disciplinary panel in London on Tuesday, the RFU said in a statement on Monday.
The two incidents occurred in the 24th and 25th minutes of the match at Allianz Park, with Ashton's mouth appearing to make contact with Waller's hand during a tangle on the floor.
The RFU's recommended sanctions state that the minimum ban for biting is 12 weeks for a low-end offence, up to an entry point of 24 weeks for a top-end offence – with a maximum suspension of 208 weeks.
Northampton director of rugby Jim Mallinder confirmed after the game that his player said he had been bitten on the hand. He [Waller] just repeated what he said to the referee [Greg Garner], in that he had been bitten on the hand," Mallinder said.
Also asked about it during his post-match press conference, Saracens coach Mark McCall added: "I have heard the accusation. I haven't seen the incident. These things will run [their] course. I suppose there is a good chance that Chris will be cited as a result, so we will see what happens.''
Ashton received a 10-week ban last season for making contact with the eye area of Ulster back Luke Marshall during a European Champions Cup game, although he protested his innocence throughout.
If the biting charge is proved, another long lay-off would be another blow to his England chances.
Ashton was ruled out of this year's RBS 6 Nations because of suspension and was left out of the 2015 World Cup squad on home soil. His last England appearance came back in the summer of 2014, against New Zealand.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here