Think of a Machiavellian rugby administration plagued by bitter rivalry, self-interest and political infighting.
Think of one where players are mysteriously dropped, and official explanations just don't stack up. So what three-letter acronym springs to mind? That's right, it could only be the SRU.
Just not the one you are familiar with. In this case, the body in question is the Samoan Rugby Union, an organisation that has celebrated the nation's ascent up the international rankings in recent years by lapsing into the sort of bumbling tomfoolery that has been the hallmark of the game's traditional powers since Webb Ellis was a lad.
The latest examples of Samoa's off-field woes came to light just a few weeks ago when controversial centre Eliota Fuimaono-Sapolu and popular captain Mahonri Schwalger were left out of the squad for the Pacific Nations Cup.
Fuimaono-Sapolu had gained notoriety at last year's World Cup for some intemperate tweeting about Welsh referee Nigel Owens. Samoa coach Stephen Betham claimed the player was omitted from the squad at the insistence of the IRB, a suggestion the IRB flatly denied.
Betham said Schwalger, 33, was dropped because of his age. However, the hooker has been in outstanding form for the Waikato Chiefs this season. Schwalger himself suggested the real reason lay in the report he had submitted last year after the World Cup, in which he accused officials of treating the tournament as a free holiday and indulging in drinking binges at the team hotel.
Schwalger has since called for SRU chairman Tuilaepa Sa'ilele Malielegaoi to be ditched. Not so easy when the individual in question also happens to be Prime Minister. And we think our lot are bit of a shower?
Despite all this, Samoa have been looking rather useful just lately. Since their breakthrough appearance at the 1991 World Cup, they have established themselves as the strongest of the South Sea Island nations, progress reflected by their ninth place in the world rankings – two better than Scotland.
Reflected, too, by the fact that they will today take on Japan in the final of the Pacific Nations Cup in Tokyo, a match they are clear favourites to win.
Indications are that they will be at full-strength against Scotland in Suva on Saturday. Like Andy Robinson's side, they did not get out of their pool at the World Cup, but they were hardly disgraced, with neither Wales nor South Africa beating them by a margin of more than eight points.
Small wonder that Andy Robinson celebrated yesterday's win over Fiji by pointing out that Scotland have "a lot to work on" as they set off on the 600-mile flight north to the final stop of their 2012 tour. The prospect of a clean sweep beckons, but a mighty obstacle stands there too.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article