HIGH Street shoe firm CJ Clark yesterday beat off a #184m bid to wrest
control from family hands.
Shareholders rejected a move to sell the 168-year-old firm, founded on
Quaker traditions, to conglomerate Berisford International.
After an orderly and sometimes passionate extraordinary general
meeting at Shepton Mallet, Somerset, shareholders voted by a majority of
more than 52% to reject the resolution recommending the sale. With
around 72 million shares involved in the voting, 52.57% were pledged
against the sale.
The decision was greeted with cheers and some applause at the
Showering Pavilion in the Royal Bath and West showground.
Around 800 shareholders had spent most of the day debating the
resolution which was recommended by most of the board of CJ Clark -- one
of the UK's largest privately owned companies.
It took nearly two hours for the scrutineers to sort out the
complexities of the voting system which decided the fate of the family
business founded by two Quaker farmer brothers at Street in Somerset,
who made sheepskin slippers for sale.
The bid had come from the international holding company, Berisford
International headed by millionaire chief executive Alan Bowkett.
Berisford's offer split the board and led to feuding among family
members, who together hold 70% of the shares. Institutions, pension
funds and employee groups each held 10% of the remainder.
Seven directors backed the sale proposal while another abstained. But
three directors strongly opposed the sale move maintaining that claims
of a family feud had been hyped up.
Their case is that the company is in profit and has good prospects
under good management. They proposed a public flotation of the company
within five years, a slimmed down board with fewer family members and a
shareholder council.
Company chairman Walter Dickson, who backed the bid, told the meeting
that a ''close'' result was likely and warned shareholders the
alternative proposals could not be turned into reality.
''There is no coherent action plan and timetable available. There is
every reason for anxiety that good management may leave or fail to be
attracted with the consequence that future plans cannot be realised.
''In my view, and the view of the majority of the board, it would be
tragic to turn down a good offer now if we are only to revert to the old
arguments and conceivably more public debate,'' he said.
Rebel director Lance Clark maintained that he and two other opposing
directors were committed to the flotation. He maintained: ''It is an
idiotic time to sell.''
He was loudly applauded when he urged the shareholders to reject the
bid and keep Clark in private hands.
The historic vote was taken in the Pavilion, which is normally the
venue for cattle shows in the centrepiece showroom of the showground.
The showground is only 11 miles away from Street, the town founded on
the early business initiative of the Quaker brothers. Street prospered
under the benevolent Quaker tradition and the business has grown to an
international concern employing 18,000 people worldwide.
After the vote Clark said that because of the closeness of the vote it
was necessary for the board to give very careful and detailed
consideration to how the company should proceed.
Mr Dickson added: ''The board will now work towards achieving
agreement on how best to take advantage of the great strength of its
brands and people in the best interests of our shareholders and
employees.''
When asked about his own position he said: ''I will cross that bridge
when we come to it.''
Mr Bowkett said he was ''saddened'' by the result but added that
Berisford was looking at other possible acquisitions.
Shares in Berisford, which were suspended last month because of the
Clark bid, will be traded again on Monday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article