THE CAGES at Porterfield prison in Inverness were yesterday
dismantled.
A former inmate, however, told The Herald last night that the change
is largely cosmetic and what is being put in place of the cages is just
as harsh. However, officers said the Scottish Prison Service decision to
remove the cages, which outraged Scottish liberal opinion for more than
20 years, was premature.
As workmen with oxy-acetylene torches began to burn out the bars and
grills used to segregate up to five disruptive prisoners, Governor Bill
Weir said: ''This will never return.''
He said the prison service had found better ways to deal with
disruptive prisoners.
The unit, which was mothballed in 1991, will now be converted to
accommodate up to 12 vulnerable prisoners such as sex offenders and
convicted policemen.
Prison officers at Porterfield have privately cast doubts on the
wisdom of the management's decision, one declaring that the cages had
saved prison officers' lives. Their concerns were echoed yesterday by Mr
Bill Stephen, chairman of the Scottish Prison Officers' Association, who
thought the move was premature.
''I just hope that we don't have to tell management in a few years
time that we told you so,'' he said.
The cages, cells within cells, operated between 1966 and 1972 when
they were closed following one of the most violent disturbances in a
Scottish prison.
Five prison officers were wounded, one losing the sight of an eye.
Four prisoners were injured: murderers Howard Wilson, Larry Winters, and
Jimmy Boyle, and armed robber William Macpherson. The cages reopened in
1978.
Hugh Collins, who was sent to the cages in 1978, said last night: ''I
am delighted that the cages are going. But the time-out units that have
been introduced are really just as bad as the cages, although they don't
have the bars.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article