A GRANDFATHER was convicted last night of sexually assaulting a
five-year-old girl in the swimming pool at the country home of ChildLine
founder Esther Rantzen.
Jurors at Guildford Crown Court, Surrey, returned ''guilty'' majority
verdicts on two of four charges facing Robert Gillings, 63.
The retired British Airways engineer had denied all four counts of
indecent assault, two of them relating to incidents last summer at the
television presenter's home in the New Forest, Hampshire.
The allegations were made by the girl's mother after they were joined
by Gillings, a family friend, and his wife, Cynthia, during a holiday at
the house.
Neither That's Life! presenter Ms Rantzen -- who set up ChildLine to
help abused children -- or her husband, TV documentary maker Desmond
Wilcox, were present at the house at the time the offences occurred.
Earlier, Gillings was cleared of sexually abusing the child in the
changing room near the pool. Judge John Bull then sent the jury back out
to deliberate over the other three counts.
They returned to convict Gillings of one of two charges relating to
incidents prior to the New Forest trip, and another charge relating to a
sexual assault while he played a game of tag with the girl in Ms
Rantzen's pool.
Gillings was granted bail until he is sentenced on July 29.
During the three-day trial, Gillings, of Addlestone, Surrey, had
claimed that ChildLine and Ms Rantzen must have put ideas into the
little girl's head.
After the case, Ms Rantzen said her home, which on occasion was used
as a holiday home, had been tainted by the incident.
''My daughter suggested we should get an exorcist,'' she said. ''It is
a happy place for us, or has been. I feel that this place which my
family and I have loved, and these children have loved, has indeed been
blighted.''
Ms Rantzen did not sit through any of the trial but Mr Wilcox, and her
16-year-old daughter Emily, supported the victim's family throughout the
evidence last week.
Ms Rantzen answered the claim by Gillings that she had ''put ideas''
in the mind of the victim.
''It is an appalling accusation. There is absolutely no way I could
ever put these thoughts into a young child's head.
''He didn't just blame me -- he blamed the child, the child's parents,
and later the police and the social workers,'' she added. ''I have to
say that child abusers are desperate and ruthless people.''
The assaulted girl's mother had sobbed as she told the court how she
and Cynthia Gillings, who have three grand-daughters by their two sons,
were sitting by the pool and her husband was preparing a barbecue when
her daughter cried out.
''She shouted out, 'Mummy, Uncle Bob keeps putting his hands under my
bikini bottoms and I don't like it, and he won't stop','' she had told
the court.
The distraught woman added: ''I tried to pretend I had not heard what
she had said . . . I kept thinking: 'Just be normal, do not respond,
carry on the day'.
''We were all pretending not to hear what she was saying. Bob just
looked at me and smirked,'' she added.
The court had heard from two doctors who examined the victim and said
she had old tears to her hymen, suggesting she had been assaulted.
After the verdicts, the victim's grandfather sobbed uncontrollably and
had to be led from the court by relatives.
The girl's father said: ''We are satisfied with the verdict, we just
want to rebuild our lives with our children.''
Prosecutor Susan Tapping last night said the maximum sentence Gillings
could receive for indecent assault was 10 years but any jail term would
depend on psychiatric reports to the court.
Discussing the condition of the little girl, she said: ''I believe
some counselling is intended. I know she had an early birthday party
this weekend before school breaks up and I believe it went well.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article