A POLL of 250 Scottish members of the Forum of Private Business has found most respondents are opposed to a devolved parliament with tax-varying powers.
Although a slim majority said they were against the concept of a law-making body, the greatest concern was over giving a Scottish parliament the power to vary taxes. This was rejected by more than two-to-one, with 67% against, 29% in favour and 4% reporting they had no opinion on the matter.
As for giving over the power to legislate, which is essentially the first question on the referendum ballot, 50% of Scottish respondents said they were opposed to this. Another 48% were for the idea, while 4% reported no opinion.
The FPB, which has 2500 members in Scotland, said it was ''particularly concerned'' about business rates. Control over these is to be devolved to the proposed Scottish parliament, which could then decide to allow local authorities to set business rates.
The FPB said it was bothered by the lack of a clear commitment to maintain the alignment of English and Scottish business rate poundages.
FPB's Scottish director, Bill Aitkenhead, said devolution, which did not reflect the concerns of private businesses, could well work against the interests of the Scottish people.
''Nobody can accurately forecast the state of the economy in five years because it will reflect unforeseeable domestic and global changes,'' Mr Aitkenhead said. ''Devolution of tax-raising powers will create significant concerns for business which may undermine confidence in investment and employment decisions.''
Some 50% of the FPB's member companies employ 10 people or less, while 80% have 20 or less on staff. The FPB does not include one-person
operations or plcs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article