BEING ranked in the world's top 250 will no longer be enough to earn British players a wild card into Wimbledon.
The Lawn Tennis Association advises the All England Club each year on which players should receive wild cards into the tournament, and its policy had been to put forward singles players with a ranking of 250 or higher.
But chief executive Michael Downey and director of player development Bob Brett, both of whom joined the governing body last year, were known not to be fans of such a rigid criteria.
Both felt players should show more than an ability simply to remain at a certain level, and that will now be the case.
An LTA spokeswoman said: "This year, in agreement with the All England Lawn Tennis Club, the LTA will not be using ATP and WTA rankings (250 for singles and 400 combined for doubles) as a basis for recommendation to the AELTC for main draw and qualifying wild cards at The Championships, 2015.
"This revised approach will enable the LTA to give consideration to attributes in addition to rankings when nominating those players who have the best chance of performing well in The Championships.
"These additional attributes will include attitude, professionalism, game development and recent form."
Improved prize money at the grand slams has made wild cards increasingly valuable, with last year's first-round losers taking home £27,000.
Downey and Brett will have been well aware that the success of British wild cards at Wimbledon in recent years has been extremely limited.
Last year, of eight players given main-draw wild cards, only Naomi Broady won her first-round match.
Decisions on which players to recommend will be made by a panel consisting of Brett, head of men's tennis Leon Smith and head of women's tennis Iain Bates.
The new policy almost certainly means younger players will be favoured, while those who have received a number of wild cards in the past will have to do a lot to prove they deserve another free ticket.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article