Construction defects which closed schools in Edinburgh could have implications for buildings across the UK, according to the council leader who commissioned an inquiry into the fiasco.
Children have now returned to 17 schools which were closed in April following the collapse of a wall at Oxgangs Primary.
Around 7,500 pupils and more than 600 staff had to be relocated while safety inspections and repairs were carried out.
Read more: Call for wider inquiry into controversial PPP contracts
Edinburgh City Council leader Andrew Burns said Scottish and UK ministers should scrutinise the findings of the inquiry, led by construction expert John Cole, when it concludes in December.
Similar defects in wall and header ties, which bind brick walls to the main structure, have been identified in other buildings including Lourdes Primary in Glasgow, he said.
The Labour councillor rejected opposition claims that the decision to fund the schools in a public-private partnership (PPP) contributed to the defects.
The schools were built by Miller Construction, which was acquired by Galliford Try in 2014, with maintenance provided by the Edinburgh Schools Partnership (ESP) with partner Amey BPO Services.
Mr Burns said the council will "absolutely" be able to hold private companies accountable for the defects, which have already cost ESP many millions of pounds in withheld council payments.
He told BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme: "We have been withholding that unitary charge for several months now, and we are talking several million pounds over the course of May to August while the schools have not been available, so there has been no cost to date to the local authority.
"There has been significant expenses in arranging buses for pupils around the city, but that has all been deducted - in effect - from the unitary charge."
There are no indications exam results have been affected by the disruption, he said.
He added: "All of the early indications are that this was a construction issue, not a contract issue.
Read more: Call for wider inquiry into controversial PPP contracts
"There were schools closed in other parts of the country, particularly in Glasgow where Lourdes Primary shut after four years of being opened, which was built under traditional procurement, so it's not as clear cut as the type of finance.
"I think this is more of a construction issue, which is why John Cole's independent investigation in Edinburgh, I think, will have implications much wider beyond Edinburgh - probably for the whole of Scotland and the rest of the UK."
He said Lourdes, which was not financed under PPP, had similar problems with wall and header ties.
Mr Burns added: "The Scottish Government has been very supportive, it is crucial to stress that we've kept both the Scottish and UK Government concerned about the terms of reference of the independent inquiry.
"I'm quite sure that ministers in both the Scottish and UK Government will continue to show an interest in what comes out of John Cole's investigation in due course."
Meanwhile, a trade union coalition has written to Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon urging her to hold a Scotland-wide inquiry into PPP.
Signatories include the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC), Unite, Unison Scotland, NASUWT, EIS general secretary Larry Flanagan and the Common Weal think-tank.
Mr Flanagan said PPP levies "ongoing exorbitant costs to the public purse, when all available money should be channelled into supporting already stretched services".
Dave Watson, head of policy at Unison Scotland, said a wider inquiry "should look at the prospects for ending existing contracts using low public sector borrowing costs".
Read more: Call for wider inquiry into controversial PPP contracts
Pat Rafferty, Unite Scottish secretary, said: "We need our MSPs to seriously consider the option of cancelling or re-negotiating unfair and extortionate PFI contracts, and we need to make sure that the private finance alternatives put forward by the Scottish Government will really deliver value for money."
Joel Benjamin, campaigner for the UK-wide campaign group People vs PFI, said: "Scotland has 40% of UK PFI schools, with just 8.5% of the UK population."
He added: "PFI is a national scandal, the faults identified in Edinburgh can be found in schools, fire-unsafe hospitals and other public infrastructure throughout England and Wales.
"PFI is a failed model, it's time for a national inquiry to lift the lid on these secretive contracts."
Scottish Conservative education spokeswoman Liz Smith said: "Almost three years ago, we asked the Scottish Government to consider making changes to the school inspection process.
"Two cabinet secretaries dragged their heels, intimating they would review matters, but it now seems nothing is happening on this front.
"The debate about school buildings is not just about the future structure of contracts. There are other things that can happen now and the SNP should act decisively to make these changes."
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here