ANAS Sarwar’s household has received almost a quarter of a million pounds in unearned income since he made a public show of relinquishing his stake in a family business.
Newly published accounts show the Scottish Labour leader’s wife has enjoyed share dividends worth £240,000 since her husband gave up his own holding in the firm.
The Scottish Tories accused Mr Sarwar of being all “show” on the issue.
The Glasgow MSP announced in September 2017 that he was giving up his shareholding in the cash and carry business started by his father, the former MP Mohammad Sarwar.
At the time, Anas Sarwar’s finances were under intense scrutiny as he vied unsuccessfully with left-wing MSP Richard Leonard for the leadership of Scottish Labour.
Mr Sarwar, the son of a millionaire who sent his children to Hutchesons’ Grammar, the same private school he attended, was criticised for taking dividend income from the family firm.
The Herald revealed he had received around £20,000 a year for 13 years while a 23% shareholder in United Wholesale (Scotland) Limited.
Company accounts showed that by 2017 he and his wife had received more than £500,000 in dividends from the firm.
He initially denied taking dividend income from his £4.8million share, then admitted he had.
READ MORE: Sarwar admits taking share cash from controversial family business
It led to the SNP branding him “one of the few, not the many”.
When then deputy Scottish Labour leader Alex Rowley accused the SNP of siding “with the millionaires rather than the millions” at an FMQs in the middle of the contest, Nicola Sturgeon joked it was unfair “to personalise this debate by bringing Anas Sarwar into it”.
Mr Sarwar also faced questions over working practices at the family firm, which then paid some staff below the living wage and had no trade union recognition for its 250 workers.
Anxious to draw a line under the controversy, Mr Sarwar dramatically relinquished his entire shareholding in UWS and transferred it to a discretionary trust for his three young sons.
His campaign boasted it meant he would be “unable to access the assets or take any remuneration for his lifetime, demonstrating his unswerving commitment to public service”.
The terms of the trust meant he could “never access the assets”, which would be held for the sole use of his children when they became adults.
However the arrangement did not include Mr Sarwar’s wife, Furheen, an NHS dentist.
The UWS accounts since 2017 show that Furheen Sarwar retained 100 “Class B shares”, and that each of these generated a £400 dividend every year since.
It means Mr Sarwar’s family has been entitled to £40,000 in unearned dividends each year since he relinquished his own shares, amounting to £240,000 by the end of 2022.
The accounts for 2022, published earlier this month, show Furheen Sarwar continued to be paid a £400 dividend for each of her Class B shares.
Even after higher rate dividend tax, the family would have been due more than £140,000 in dividend income by the end of 2021, potentially rising to nearly £170,000 by the end of 2022.
The extra was more than the average Scottish wage after tax, although not always enough to cover the fees for the couple’s three children at Mr Sarwar’s alma mater.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour faces 'nightmare scenario' over gender law court fight
The figures emerged as Labour makes the cost-of-living crisis a key plank of its general election campaign and accuses Rishi Sunak of being “out of touch” with voters.
Last week, Mr Sarwar, 40, wrote about the plight of “people who are struggling to make ends meet” amid rising prices.
Scottish Conservative MSP Murdo Fraser said: "Anas Sarwar made a big show about his interests when he was first trying to get into the Scottish Labour leadership.
“And that's what his man of the people act has always been - a show."
Asked about Mr Sarwar’s family income and his wife’s shares, Scottish Labour did not dispute any of the figures but declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel