CONTROVERSIAL proposals to invite Celtic and Rangers 'colt' sides to participate in the lower leagues of the Scottish senior game appear to have been rejected.
According to reports, the idea – proposed in a document sent to clubs last week by David Longmuir, the chief executive of the Scottish Football League – was not even discussed at a meeting of representatives from the Scottish Premier League and SFL at Hampden yesterday and, therefore, will not form part of the final plans for league reconstruction.
See our new dossier on league reconstruction - and how you can shape the debate
After talks to thrash out the specifics of the proposals that will be put to clubs, it has been reported that the document will instead call for a vote on a 12-12-18 league structure, incorporating all 42 current league sides.
Longmuir's motion to push for a 12-12-10-10 setup, with the inclusion of Old Firm reserve sides in the bottom tier, was met with resistance by a number of SFL clubs when it was suggested last week and was not on the table yesterday.
That was despite attempts from Charles Green, Rangers' chief executive, to sweeten the proposal on Monday by offering to guarantee other clubs a sum that equated to the ticket revenue of 300 Rangers fans turning up for matches should they support the plans.
Furthermore, calls from Green that the Ibrox club should be promoted to the second tier of a new structure, on account of being potential third division champions this season, are also understood not to have been heard nor referenced in the plan.
The proposal remains in draft form in the interim, say reports, with conversations still to be held on its final form before the plans are put to a vote with a view immediate implementation.
SPL clubs will cast their vote on the matter on April 15 and, while no date has been set for SFL teams to do the same, it is thought that it will also be in April.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article