Music
BBC SSO/Dausgaard
City Halls, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
four stars
ALTHOUGH both are writers of some distinction and composers of considerable accomplishment, as well as being very popular virtuoso pianists, in other ways Franz Liszt and Stephen Hough would seem to have little in common. Few would accuse the refined Hough of “vulgarity”, an accusation often levelled Liszt, and while Hough performed Liszt’s Piano Concerto No 1 with polish, passion and flair, he plays down the fireworks and theatricality. If he had a mane of hair, it would remain untossed.
Conductor Thomas Dausgaard was at his attentive best over Hough’s choice of tempi in the opening sections of the work to cue the orchestral soloists, and the pair were in complete accord over the dynamic arc of the piece, building to a finale that was musically huge both from the pianist and in the orchestral response.
Nonetheless, the Liszt was the smallest work in the afternoon’s programme, sitting between Bartok’s Orchestral Suites No 1 & 2, the earlier of which, played after the interval, may have been having its first Scottish performance.
The Suite No. 2 is not only more familiar but also unmistakeably Bartok – and Hungarian – from its opening bars on harp and solo cello, with the violas following swiftly behind. The composers uses the twin harps to mimic a dulcimer or cimbalom, and as well as being orchestrated with precocious mastery, the work has some lovely solo moments. Most obviously those were for Simon Butterworth on bass clarinet at the start of the third movement, following leader Laura Samuel’s opportunity at the end of the second, but muted trumpet and cor anglais have fine moments as well.
The latter, and Samuel, also featured in the second movement of the first suite, which is much less immediately identifiable as the work of the composer, but is another astonishing piece of work from a man not yet half-way through his twenties. His Hungarian identity asserts itself in the clarinet melody of the fourth movement, before a trip around the dance-floor leads to an anthemic ending.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here