Festival Theatre
The Secret River
King’s Theatre
Neil Cooper
Four stars
When Kate Grenville’s epic novel of Australian colonialism appeared in 2005, it hit a raw collective nerve regarding the white English settlers’ treatment of the indigenous Aborigine community. Writer Andrew Bovell and director Neil Armfield’s reimagining of Grenville’s story for Armfield’s Sydney Theatre Company production takes it somewhere else again in an at times troubling but necessary look at a still largely hidden history.
Grenville’s story focuses on William Thornhill, a nineteenth century London thief spared the gallows and transported to Australia, where he stakes a claim for land close to the Hawkesbury River with his wife Sal and their sons William and Dick, regardless of who was there first.
With an uneasy impasse formed with the Dharug people, Thornhill forms a kind of Dickensian ex-pats’ club with his boorish neighbours. Flashes of harmony come through what is effectively a clothes swap between Sal and two of the Dharug women. Young Dick, meanwhile, embraces the ways of his new playmates to the extent that, when they whoosh down the mud-slide they make in the centre of the stage, it’s as if all divisions are being wiped away with the children’s’ state of un-massacred, prejudice-free joy.
All this is watched over by Ningali Lawford-Wolf’s Dhirtumbin, Dulla Djin, who is both narrator and witness to the atrocity the play builds towards. As she says at one point, “Someone has to see it.”
Bovell and Armfield have created a beautifully stately piece of work, in which Nathaniel Dean’s Thornhill leads a twenty-strong cast as Thornhill moves from humble ex-con trying to catch a break to ambitious laird of someone else’s property. The nuance in his performance is a tragedy of class conflict and everyday ambition, with Georgia Adamson’s Sal a similar bundle of contradictions.
The play is pulsed on Stephen Curtis’ expansively empty set by Iain Grandage’s exquisite score, played live on piano and cello by Isaac Hayward, and with plaintive chorales that points up what is already an overwhelming lament for a nation’s shame.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here