Theatre review:
Solaris,
Royal Lyceum Theatre,
Edinburgh,
Neil Cooper,
Four Stars
When the twin suns come out on the floating ocean of planet Solaris in David Greig’s new adaptation of Polish writer Stanislaw Lem’s 1961 existential science-fiction novel, the swathes of red and blue light up psychologist Kris Kelvin’s entire world.
Kris has been dispatched to the ship keeping an eye on Solaris to find out why radio silence has been so prolonged. The answer from Drs Sartorius and Snow comes in the form of another set of visitors, seemingly flesh and blood reincarnations of significant others dreamt into being by the planet capitalising on the crew’s emotional baggage.
This is the prognosis of the now deceased Gibarian, seen played on film by Hugo Weaving in a series of left behind video diaries. These gradually shed light on the ghosts that linger, too often stymying us from taking a leap into the void of unknown tomorrows.
Matthew Lutton’s co-production between the Lyceum, the Malthouse Theatre Melbourne and the Lyric, Hammersmith wafts woozily through its series of short scenes on Hyemi Shin’s ingenious white box set. These are illuminated by lighting designer Paul Jackson’s washes of colour, and punctuated by the stage curtain being slowly lowered and raised as if moving ever deeper through assorted psychic hatches to get to the truth of being.
In this sense, Greig, Lutton and their team have taken Lem’s story –famously filmed by both Andrei Tarkovsky and Steven Soderbergh – and dramatised it as the sort of therapy session the cosmonauts of inner space behind me-generation sci-fi made their own.
The five actors onstage, including either Almila Kaplangi or Maya McKee as a visiting child, give their heart and soul to this, with a wonderfully ebullient Polly Frame as Kris and Keegan Joyce’s Ray the fools who rush in where Jade Ogugua’s Sartorius and Fife Simbo’s Snow fear to tread.
In the end, Greig and Lutton explore how past, present and future worlds collide as we orbit each other, looking for somewhere safe to land among the hopefully brave new worlds that offer up infinite possibilities.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here