Opera
Bride & Gloom
St John’s Smith Square, London
Keith Bruce
four stars
LONDON-born Nancy Storace was a huge star of the opera in the time of Mozart, singing at the premiere of his hit The Marriage of Figaro in Vienna in 1786 when she was just 21. She and Irish tenor Michael Kelly also appeared in Gli sposi malcontenti, The Discontented Newly-weds, at the city’s Burgtheater the previous year, which was written by her older brother, Stephen Storace.
Most of Storace’s music has been lost, but Bampton Classical Opera have this year revived his great hit, under the snappier title Bride & Gloom, with a cast that includes two graduates of the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland’s Alexander Gibson Opera School, Caroline Kennedy and Arthur Bruce (declaration of interest). As Scottish Opera gives concert performances of two rare operas – Mascagni’s Zanetto and Wolf-Ferrari’s Susanna’s Secret – at the Lammermuir Festival, here was another forgotten work that was well worth the rediscovery.
Its similarity to the work of Mozart is uncanny, both in plot and characters and musical style, which is not to suggest that the more famous composer was guilty of plagiarism. Characters like Kennedy’s scheming maid Bettina were tropes of the theatre at the time, as were thwarted liaisons, poor disguises and hiding in and behind chairs and in gardens, all of which happen in Bride & Gloom.
If Storace does not have the genius for melody of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, his score is still lively and tuneful and it was immaculately played at St John’s by chamber ensemble Chroma, conducted by Anthony Kraus, who also played the continuo harpsichord. Jeremy Gray’s production was also blessed with a very fine cast, with Jenny Stafford and Aoife O’Sullivan as sisters Eginia (the Nancy Storace role) and Enrichetta, whose love lives are the substance of the plot.
Cleverly staged on a set made from outsized wedges of wedding cake and costumed, by Jess Iliff, in kitsch 70s style, it looked a little like a lost TV sitcom or an Alan Ayckbourn period piece. The small Oxfordshire-based company can be very proud of their inspired revival.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article