The Night Watch
King’s Theatre, Edinburgh
Neil Cooper
***
THE shadow of St Paul’s hangs over a war-torn London throughout this revival of Hattie Naylor’s adaptation of Sarah Waters’ brooding novel of overlapping lives, brought to life for this current tour by the Original Theatre Company and York Theatre Royal.
It’s there in 1947, where the story starts with Phoebe Pryce’s rudderless former war-time ambulance worker Kay, wandering the bombed-out London streets in search of old certainties and lost love as the crux of a romantic triangle with Florence Roberts’ Helen and Izabella Urbanowicz’s Julia.
It’s there too as Waters’ story rewinds, first to 1944, then to 1941, both less indifferent times that show how Helen ended up running a dating agency for those attempting to get back to how things were. That was before the first excited flush of her affair with Julia left her in a similar state of decline.
Everybody is bereft in the first half of Alastair Whatley’s production, with both Helen’s assistant Viv and Viv’s brother Duncan attempting to find some kind of salvation by holding on to the past. As they cling to each other for dear life in the emotional crossfire, like St Paul’s, they survive. Like the blitzed houses they once occupied, however, they are empty shells, sleep-walking their way through loveless half-lives in the rubble.
A slow-burning sense of sadness permeates the world conjured up by David Woodhead’s set and the midnight blues of Nic Farman’s lighting, with Whatley’s cast of eight woozily pulsed along by Sophie Cotton’s stately score.
Through the slow unfurling of fractured lives, we see the damage inflicted on a generation whose accidental flight into personal liberation as much as something greater ends up leaving them with nothing once they come blinking into the light.
If things don’t always catch fire here, Naylor’s reimagining of Waters’ story nevertheless lays bare the need to find a reason to live throughout dark times.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here