Anatomy of a Suicide
Royal Conservatoire of Scotland, Glasgow
Neil Cooper
Four Stars
There is something unflinching about Alice Birch’s overlapping dramatic triptych, performed here with relentless drive by the RCS’ final year BA Acting students. This is the case from the play’s gauntlet-throwing title onwards, as it edges slowly but surely towards the inevitable set of conclusions it marks out across 70 years and three generations of women. The painful study of hand-me-down neuroses that unfurls across time-zones is forensic and at times harrowing in its matter-of-fact study of Carol, Anna and Bonnie, whose lives it maps and unravels as they mentally self-lacerate themselves to death.
As Carol, Vera Koski lays bare both her character’s quietly self-destructive tendencies and a perceptive and articulate self-knowingness, though Anna’s birth does nothing to heal her. Anna by turn goes her own way, going from heroin using wild child to worn-out mum at the end of her tether with the arrival of her daughter Bonnie. This is brought to life by Charlie Oscar with a mixture of bravado and vulnerability. Natalie Mitson’s Bonnie may be childless, but she too is laden with piled-on anxieties not of her making.
As volleys of cross-talk rattle through the years, it becomes a dazzling atonal symphony of words from each timeline, the counterpoints of which are as insistent and as demanding as a modernist chorale or a Robert Ashley spoken-word opera. The occasional politesse of saying yes, no or thank-you are fleeting moments of unison across the years.
Director Finn den Hertog’s sensitive knitting together of the play’s various strands among his cast of thirteen becomes a howl of hurt as troublingly intense as a Jane Arden film. Astrid Lindgreen Hjermind’s tile-covered set, meanwhile, suggests that wiping away the mess isn’t as easy as it looks. Koski, Oscar and Mitson’s portraits of three shades of despair suggests each woman might shatter into a thousand pieces any second in a staggering impressionistic evocation of fractured psyches in freefall.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here