The Gentlemen (18)****
Director: Guy Ritchie
With: Matthew McConaughey, Charlie Hunnam,
Hugh Grant
Runtime: 113 mins
After a couple of big budget Hollywood flops in the shape of The Man From UNCLE and King Arthur, Guy Ritchie found improbable success again with last year’s live action remake of Aladdin, but now returns to his Lock Stock roots for this London crime comedy that starts the new year off with a bang.
Only now it’s not so much a caper he’s bringing us as a parable, a gangster drama with a conscience to sit right alongside its streak of poor taste.
Just as Brad Pitt did in Snatch, McConaughey adds the American glamour and box office clout as Michael, a high-stakes drug dealer looking to sell on the UK empire he’s built over decades.
His right-hand man Ray (Hunnam) does much of the leg work for him, but adding to the fun is that the chain of events surrounding this sale is told in a sort of wraparound structure, wherein Hugh Grant’s sleazy investigator recounts the goings on to Ray (and us at the same time) as part of his scheme to blackmail them.
Grant enjoys himself enormously in just one of a series of top-line comic performances that draw laughs from their deadpan nature and the carefully crafted one-liners they’ve been give to spit. McConaughey Is charisma personified, Hunnam has probably never been better, and that’s before we even get to Colin Farrell’s perfectly judged supporting turn as a local heavy reluctantly drawn into the malarkey.
As writer, Ritchie is on familiar ground, weaving a tangled web around a collection of larger than life characters, with no shortage of crosses and twists along the way.
As director, he reins in his flashier impulses, so no super fast cutting or slo-mo fighting here, just a yarn well told that’s hugely entertaining but serious and tense when it needs to be, with everything and everyone coming together in the end in the traditional Ritchie manner.
It’s not inoffensive, but it is big and it is clever, and shows us that the British film industry can still knock genre movies out of the park every once in a while.
Paul Greenwood
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here