Fund chief Martin Gilbert yesterday shrugged off suggestions he should step down as chairman of beleaguered FirstGroup after only 8% of shareholder votes, the same as a year ago, opposed his re-election at the annual meeting in Aberdeen.
Mr Gilbert, a City heavyweight after leading his Aberdeen Asset Management into the FTSE-100 this year, has chaired local neighbour FirstGroup since 1995 and is said to have been urged to quit by some investors unhappy with the group's struggling share price.
"That is not the case," Mr Gilbert said after the meeting, pointing to the unchanged vote.
"Clearly the rest of the board would tell me if they didn't think I was the right guy to chair the business."
On the spread of his commitments, he added: "I have given up Aberdeen Football Club."
On two high-powered non-executive appointments to the FirstGroup board next week, Mr Gilbert said: "The process started six to eight months ago, this was not a reaction to shareholder pressure."
But he added: "Inevitably when things get tough in a business, shareholders have every right to be unhappy – I am a fund manager myself, I understand that better than most."
FirstGroup has promised to sell off parts of its UK bus operations, against a background of a £2.1 billion debt, but Mr Gilbert said the debt was "more a perceived than an actual problem".
He said the group had £800 million of headroom, and selling unprofitable bus businesses was needed to boost cashflow, because "we don't really want to increase debt to pay the dividend".
He added: "There are plenty of banks willing to lend us money – they just don't want to lend the general public money."
The chairman said he had waived a £34,000 increase on his £191,000 fee this year because a pay rise was inappropriate "when so many people are suffering in the UK".
Tim O'Toole, chief executive, told The Herald he had waived a bonus of up to 100% of his £846,000 salary, because of "sensitivities to the issue of corporate leadership" and when shareholders were suffering pain.
However, Mr O'Toole told the meeting: "I believe we will get this company back to the position it should enjoy as a result of our predominant position in our markets."
He said the group's three substantial US businesses had made strong progress in the past year, with the rapid turnround at First Student prompting a 50% increase in annual savings estimates. He said the fast-growing Greyhound Express would in the long-term prevail over Stagecoach-owned competitor Megabus. The UK rail business was "shooting the lights out" in revenue and passenger growth, and the share price allowed no value for regaining or winning franchises up for grabs over the next few years.
FirstGroup was the only operator to pre-qualify in all four current franchise tenders and would win its fair share, Mr O'Toole said, telling a shareholder: "I think it is in the Government's interest that the management team stays in the industry."
On the troubled UK bus division, Mr O'Toole said the "rejuvenating and repositioning" plan was the one he had outlined at his first annual meeting. "The mistake I made was in believing the economic conditions were such that we would have the space and time to do it."
A fare increase last January had backfired, he admitted, prompting the profits warning at the end of March which had seen the shares slump.
The restructuring would include better buses and even lower fares where necessary, while the unprofitable operations to be sold had no particular geographic identity.
Asked by a shareholder whether buyers would be so easily found for these assets, Mr O'Toole said: "We have had significant interest."
He added: "I agree that Stagecoach has set some standards in local markets that we need to be honest with ourselves to make changes to equal them."
Charles Stanley broke ranks with other analysts to rate the stock a medium-term buy, saying it was currently "pricing in a great deal of trouble". The shares rose 7.5p to 212.9p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article