Our share tips continued to enjoy their early Christmas celebrations with all four of our portfolios pushing to record highs as we conducted our weekly review on Wednesday morning.
Virtually all of our recommendations recorded some sort of rise with a particularly strong performance from the 2012 portfolio which ended the week no less than 3.1% ahead.
That took its overall gain past the 30% level for the first time, helped by further investment support for Aberdeen Asset Management, takeover gossip surrounding Petrofac and a cold weather boost for Scottish Gas group, Centrica.
The 2010 and 2011 portfolios also performed well although both stopped just short of their own significant milestones of 80% and 50% appreciation respectively.
The one disappointment was the 2009 list, which managed a rise of just less than 1% after a slippage in drinks group Diageo took the edge off gains elsewhere.
There is still a slight chance the portfolio can meet our goal of 100% appreciation by the end of this year but it will need to add another £190 (3.2%) in the next fortnight.
Much depends on the progress of talks to avoid the US fiscal cliff and we were tempted to add a major American earner to the selections in a final gamble to meet the target.
In the event, prudence prevailed and we will continue to sit on our large cash reserves until the talks over potential tax rises and social security cuts run their course.
Meantime, we continued to take steps to ensure we can lock in the bulk of recent gains on any major stock market set back and have raised our stop/loss levels on a number of shares including AAM, Standard Life, Carr's Milling and Halma.
This figure is used as a sell signal and is adjusted each week on an upwards-only basis.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article