THE Competition Commission deserves credit for ruffling the well-groomed feathers of the accountancy profession with the provisional findings of its investigation into the audit market.
It has raised important questions about the current state of play.
The commission's assertion that auditors may too often focus on the needs of senior management of client companies, rather than the shareholders they are appointed to serve, proved particularly unpopular with the profession yesterday.
However, given the questions the financial crisis raised in the minds of the public about the role of auditors, it is important that radical reform of the market-place is at least considered.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland does not like the idea of mandatory rotation of audit firms.
There may be an argument that long-serving auditors have built up important knowledge of a big company's sometimes complex activities. However, there is probably a better argument for a fresh eye in an audit.
And ICAS's view that rotation might "merely result in the work being reallocated amongst the Big Four firms" highlights the biggest problem in the audit market.
The mid-tier players, by virtue of their scale or geographical spread, often have little realistic chance of winning the big audits.
It is lamentable that we have got to a position where there are only four big players, mainly as a result of a slew of mergers over the decades. This creates huge challenges for the future, regardless of best intentions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article