BIOFUEL maker Argent Energy has reported a 57% hike in profits for the financial year before it was sold in a deal thought to be worth £80 million.
The company, based at Newarthill, near Motherwell, saw its turnover rise 7.4% from £47.2m to £50.7m in 2012. That came in spite of European sales reversing from £27.7m to £14.6m, although UK turnover made up for the overseas slump by accelerating from £19.5m to £36.1m.
Accounts filed at Companies House show pre-tax profits soared from £3.05m to £4.8m across the 12 months.
Argent was bought by a subsidiary of London-based global conglomerate John Swire & Sons in July this year.
That was believed to have sparked multimillion-pound windfalls for managing director Jim Walker and other executives along with other shareholders including Sir Brian Souter's investment vehicle.
Argent said it had sold almost £5.1m of biofuel to Sir Brian's Stagecoach during 2012, up from £3.45m in 2011.
The accounts suggest Argent - which makes fuel from materials such as used cooking oil, fats and grease - was in healthy shape prior to the takeover deal by Swire.
The directors said the increase in profit exceeded expectations and added: "The market continued to be volatile throughout the year but management increased feedstock throughput, biodiesel output and improved operational performance such that a significant improvement in margins was achieved."
Cash had increased from £323,000 to almost £3.9m while net debt was shaved from £7.2m to less than £3.3m.
Directors' emoluments increased slightly from £578,000 to £587,000 however the highest paid saw their rewards slip from £305,000 to £276,000.
£1.1m of dividends were paid in 2012, compared to no payment in the prior year.
Average staff numbers were steady at 64 with employee costs at £2.6m.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article