BUSINESSES in Scotland will face higher costs to protect their intellectual property (IP) if a dedicated patent court is lost, according to the Law Society of Scotland.
The Intellectual Property Bill, which goes before a committee in the House of Commons today, is intended to establish a new patent court system across the UK.
But none of the four possible local divisions of the new Unitary Patent Court is planned for Scotland.
Gill Grassie, member of the Law Society of Scotland's intellectual property committee and a partner at Brodies, warned the cost of enforcing patents would rise if lawyers and firms had to travel to London or further afield to participate in court actions.
She said: "It means a lot of inconvenience and additional time, which could be a drain on the company's management resources.
"It pretty much automatically increases costs, even if you think about the basic things like travel and accommodation."
Ms Grassie highlighted Scotland's rich innovation history, from James Watt's steam engine improvements, to John Logie Baird's television, as well as in newer industries such as renewables and life sciences,
Ms Grassie voiced fears that losing out on the court could lead to intellectual property lawyers leaving Scotland to pursue their field elsewhere.
Patent rights can currently be litigated in the Court of Session.
The Law Society wants the three separate legal jurisdictions in the UK - England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland - to each have a patent court.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article