Several hundred businesses that claim to have suffered at the hands of Royal Bank of Scotland's "turnaround" division have appointed US law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan to represent them in a planned case against the bank.
The RBS GRG Business Action Group members - who include business owners, managers and directors, as well as shareholders and bondholders - claim to have been let down by the bank's global restructuring group (GRG). A spokesperson for the action group said: "We are committed to taking action before Christmas, and Quinn Emanuel will now start processing the first 200 viable claims. We anticipate having at least 600 registered."
Allegations - which were also highlighted by former government adviser Lawrence Tomlinson last November - include that RBS "manufactured" defaults via misleading valuations on firms' commercial properties, and that GRG bankrupted viable firms by piling on excessive fees and charges, enabling its West Register property division to scoop up properties at knockdown prices.
RBS has denied the allegations. It commissioned law firm Clifford Chance to conduct a review, which rejected Tomlinson's "central allegation".
Last month, RBS GRG Business Action Group appointed London-based Clyde & Co as its lawyers, but on 24 September the firm stepped down after some of its insurance clients said it was "conflicted", as they provided cover to RBS.
America's leading business litigation law firm, Quinn Emanuel has had a London arm since 2008. It is already representing Standard Life, Prudential, Legal & General, Aviva and others in a separate case against RBS related to the bank's £12 billion rights issue in 2008.
RBS is shutting down GRG, claiming that improving economic conditions have reduced the need for restructuring. A bank spokesman declined to comment on the planned legal action.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article