THE former head of Ireland's central bank has said he regretted his failure to foresee the country's 2008 financial meltdown, but in his first public appearance since the crisis said financial regulation alone could not have prevented it.
John Hurley who retired as central bank governor a year after he backed a controversial 2008 blanket guarantee on all bank liabilities, told a parliamentary inquiry that the central bank had underestimated the dangers Ireland was facing at the time.
"It is clear that in hindsight the warnings in our financial stability reports should have been much stronger and I very much regret that the bank underestimated the risk," Mr Hurley said.
He said that while he was responsible for monitoring macroeconomic stability, it was the responsibility of the independent financial regulator to directly monitor the banks.
But "I do not believe that regulation could on its own have stopped this crisis," he said. "The forces that were at work, both domestically and internationally, were very formidable."
Mr Hurley defended his role in backing a banking guarantee in which Ireland tied its fate to its financial sector in the early hours of September 30, 2008.
He said the country only had "one opportunity to assuage the markets."
The European Central Bank, he said, had made clear to Ireland that the government was expected to stand behind the banks to avoid a "Lehman-type situation."
The guarantee helped force the government to pour €64 billion into its banking sector and take a bailout from the European Union and International Monetary Fund.
He also defended the decision not to allow Anglo Irish Bank to fail rather than including it in the guarantee. The failure of Anglo and fellow failed lender Irish Nationwide cost the Irish state around €35bn.
"It was considered that the signal effect of nationalising Anglo would be more negative than positive and could raise market concerns about the systemic weakness," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article