Sir Philip Hampton has signed off as RBS chairman with a dismissal of the bank's latest technology malfunction as an "outage" that bears no relation to the 2012 systems crash that saw the bank fined £57million.
Neither the chairman nor chief executive Ross McEwan mentioned last week's IT problem, which saw 600,000 banking payments delayed for a day or more, in their presentations to the annual meeting in Edinburgh.
Treasury committee chairman Andrew Tyrie has said the bank faces a potential summons to explain the episode, while the British Bankers Association has called it "unacceptable".
But the issue was raised only by shareholder Robert Beattie, who questioned how the bank could achieve its goal of being 'number one for customer service' if it failed to rectify its IT problems.
Sir Philip responded: "We do apologise to all customers who were inconvenienced by last week's outage, mercifully it was nothing like the issue we faced in 2012, that was overwhelmingly because of all the very substantial investments we have made in that time." He said "most of the kit we have is pretty new" and the Financial Conduct Authority had confirmed in 2012 that the bank was "pretty strongly invested in new equipment".
Sir Philip said the incident had affected only five per cent of the bank's transactions in a single day, and those affected would be properly compensated, adding: "We have not yet identified...a root cause."
Mr McEwan said: "We have spent £750m on making our systems more resilient so the 2012 issue doesn't happen again." He said it had been due to a "file not connecting properly" and the bank would be "doing a full review for the board and our regulator".
Sir Philip had said that on his arrival in 2009 the bank was "overstretched, over-exposed, and underpowered", but since then it had shrunk its balance sheet by £900billion and lifted its capital ratio target from 8 to 13 per cent, while the share price had quadrupled. But he "did not anticipate in any way the £10bn of regulatory fines and litigation charges and customer redress" which had delayed its capital rebuild and reduced shareholder value.
Sir Philip said the government's decision to begin selling its shares would "undoubtedly be a turning-point for RBS and welcomed we believe by investors generally", adding: "RBS has made great progress, it has been fundamentally rebuilt."
Mr McEwan said the bank had "delivered against every commitment we made in 2014".
The chairman was quizzed by shareholder Ben Travers-Smith of the Move Your Money campaign on why RBS had in 2010 promised not to close the "last bank in town" yet had in the past two years closed over 160 such branches to date.
Sir Philip said: "The main issue really is what customers want overall...customers are moving and we have to move with them." He went on: "We can't go on doing wrong things simply because a few years ago we made the wrong decision."
Mr McEwan said the bank's hand had been forced by other banks "rushing to close the second last" in town. He said: "Since then we have put in 11,500 new points that customers can use to pay money in and take money out." The bank's tie-up with the Post Office was helping that network survive, he added.
The meeting heard at length from some of the small business customers who hold the bank responsible for the destruction of their companies. Robert Mitchell said there was a "massive risk to this bank going forward" from litigation by companies, which could become "the business PPI". But he said there appeared to be a "spirit of new leadership and transparency" in the bank, with Mr McEwan having agreed to review his case file on 450 businesses.
Questioned by a shareholder on whether 'free banking' would survive, Sir Philip suggested that free current accounts had helped to create the PPI mis-selling scandal, by forcing banks to compensate for low returns in one area with "inappropriately high returns" in others. "If you get no charge for your current account, it means some other product that the bank is selling to you must compensate," Sir Philip said.
*The government has cut its stake in Lloyds Banking Group to below 17 percent, UK Financial Investments has said. It takes the sum recovered for the taxpayer to £11.5bn.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article