UK OIL exploration and production company EnQuest is planning to raise $138 million (£107m) via a rights issue in order to fund its acquisition of the remainder of the Magnus oil field.
In January, London-listed EnQuest acquired an initial 25 per cent stake in the field - situated 100 miles north of Shetland - from BP.
Under the terms of the transaction, EnQuest also had the right to increase its stake in Magnus to 100%, with the option exercisable at any time between July 1 this year and January 15 next year.
Yesterday, the firm announced to the stock exchange that it would be acquiring those assets as well as increasing its interests in related production facilities such as the Sullom Voe terminal on Shetland.
It is seeking to raise money from shareholders to meet $100m of the $300m cost of the acquisition.
EnQuest chief executive Amjad Bseisu said the business had decided to exercise the option because the deal was “compelling”.
“Our view of Magnus as a high-quality asset has been enhanced since acquiring our initial 25% interest through the successful completion of two infill wells and the application of our asset life extension expertise,” he said.
“We have also identified two further infill wells, both of which have very strong returns, to drill in 2019.”
While the rights issue will only cover a third of the cost of the transaction, BP will provide a vendor loan to EnQuest for the remainder of the sum, with the debt being repaid via a 50:50 cashflow-sharing agreement on the 75% Magnus interest.
EnQuest’s shares fell by as much as 14% when the issue was announced.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here