NEARLY three-quarters of business leaders consider it important that a withdrawal agreement is ratified before the UK leaves the European Union, with two-thirds believing a no-deal outcome would be bad for their organisations, a poll shows.
And businesses were narrowly in favour of a second referendum on EU membership.
The survey, published yesterday by the Institute of Directors, shows only 13 per cent of respondents believe a no-deal scenario would be positive, with 46% warning such an outcome would be “very negative” for their businesses and 20% saying it would be “somewhat negative”.
Of the 800-plus IoD members surveyed, 46% said a second referendum would be in their interests and 44% did not believe it would, with the remainder declaring they did not know.
The IoD said the survey results showed the view of its members was that “a withdrawal deal has to be the priority”.
IoD director general Stephen Martin said: “The message from our members is clear – they urgently want to see the UK get a withdrawal deal across the line. Up and down the country, firms large and small are deeply concerned by the potential for a no-deal scenario, and business investment is already being choked off by the surrounding uncertainty.
“The need to avoid no deal must be at the forefront of MPs’ minds when they come to vote on the agreement. The deal we have might not satisfy everyone, but this is still the clearest route to securing a smooth exit.”
He added: “A second referendum is not an easy way out of the political bind we are in, with business opinion split on whether it would be a good idea now.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here