Superdry co-founder Julian Dunkerton has suffered another blow in his bid to return to the fashion chain's board.
Investor advisory firm PIRC on Wednesday joined Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) in recommending shareholders reject Mr Dunkerton's attempt to regain a seat at the top table.
It argued that his election, along with that of Boohoo chairman Peter Williams, would erode the level of board independence as Mr Dunkerton is a major shareholder in the firm.
Earlier this month, Mr Dunkerton officially demanded an investor meeting as part of his efforts to stage a comeback, having left the board last year.
He is acting with co-founder James Holder and together the pair own 29% of Superdry.
The duo said on Wednesday that they were disappointed by the latest developments.
Responding to the ISS, the pair said in a statement: "Naturally we are disappointed by the ISS recommendation. However, we acknowledge it is extremely rare for ISS to support shareholders who propose changes in corporate strategies."
They added: "The strategic and leadership failings at Superdry remain clear and the financial and operational impacts are obvious and profound: we know how to fix these issues. We continue to engage productively with shareholders, and we are hugely encouraged by the positive response to our proposals."
For its part, Superdry has said Mr Dunkerton's return would be "extremely damaging" to company's prospects.
It added that his strategy would "fail", be "divisive" and reintroduce a leadership style that does not fit within the "open-minded collaborative culture, values and operation of the company".
The shareholder meeting to decide whether to reinstall Mr Dunkerton on the board will take place on April 2, and the board is recommending that investors vote against his return.
Superdry is also advising investors to reject Mr Williams' appointment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here